Live Scan vs. Ink Fingerprinting: What’s the Difference?
When it comes to fingerprint-based background checks, two common methods are used: Live Scan fingerprinting and ink fingerprinting. While both serve the same purpose, they differ in process, accuracy, and application.
Live Scan Fingerprinting
Live Scan is a modern, electronic fingerprinting method that digitally captures fingerprints and transmits them directly to law enforcement or background check agencies. This process eliminates the need for physical fingerprint cards, reducing errors and processing time. Live Scan is widely used for employment background checks, professional licensing, and government applications. It is faster, cleaner, and more reliable than traditional ink fingerprinting.
Ink Fingerprinting
Ink fingerprinting is the traditional method where a person’s fingers are rolled in ink and pressed onto a fingerprint card. This method is still required for certain federal or out-of-state background checks, as well as for countries that do not accept digital submissions. While effective, ink fingerprints can sometimes smudge, leading to rejection and requiring resubmission.
Which One Is Right for You?
If your application allows digital submission, Live Scan is the preferred choice due to its speed and accuracy. However, if your request specifically asks for fingerprint cards, ink fingerprinting may be necessary.
For reliable and hassle-free fingerprinting, trust National Live Scan Fingerprinting, your go-to service provider for fast and secure background checks.
Comments
Post a Comment